Jump to content

Dettie

Head Admins
  • Content Count

    946
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Posts posted by Dettie

  1. A little update on my side.

    Since the intel 10900 has 65W TPM says intel, but in real life goes above 200W.
    That air cooler was just not good enough. On 100% 5min stress cpu went to 96°C and meltdown at 100°C shutdown

    XMP (xtreme memory profile) is active in bios .  cpu goes 4.61ghz when needed stable

    I upgrade the cooling to MX4 paste and watercooling for the CPU (thx to qbd for showing this one)


    https://www.arctic.de/en/Liquid-Freezer-II-360/ACFRE00068A

    CPU on max load 100%  +20min   75°C now

    But this is on max load, while gaming, cpu goes around 50°C , so very nice
    Idle is around 30°C
     

     

  2. You are banned by a admin for  Rule #2 No Abusive/Offensive language or names 

    By playing on our server you need to follow our rules. Rules can be read on server !rules and here 

    https://noname.zone/index.php?/topic/5653-nn-serverss-rules

    Since this is your first time, you had a 1day temp ban. This wil end today

    Plz behave next time on your language

    We don't want to such this again

    HOW SMALL YOUR DICKS ARE TO USE GLS?    Sun, 14/03/21 (00:17)
    admin clown time    Sun, 07/03/21 (10:12)
    fucking shits    Sat, 06/03/21 (21:33)
    fucking lmgs and camping    Thu, 04/03/21 (21:18)
    push pussies    Tue, 02/03/21 (14:08)
    you your mother dies man    Mon, 01/03/21 (10:51)

    ...

     

    Blitz and Badass like this
  3. Hello all :P sorry for bumping an old long ago topic.

    But i need some advice. You see my setup here, but since i have this system. My cpu goes sky high in temp on heavy load.
    CPU = I9 - 10900 stock (not the special editions) MAX temp = 100 °C
    So yesterday i did something high demanding ( 100% load and intel turbo mode on) result 96°C

    I didn't saw this for the first 5min, because it's a quiet fan setup.

    So basicly after some search ,
    disable intel boost mode = 55°C on 100% load (2.8ghz) 65W TDP
    enable intel boost mode = 96°C on 100% load (4.61ghz , 5.2ghz is possible also) 

    Now i have this CPU cooler, adviced from my shop where i bought my computer,
    after some digging ofcourse they equiped a much to small block for cooling
    Scythe Mugen 5 PCGH Edition (internet search = 150 TDP max)

    As i read this processor goes around 200 - 250W TDP on max stresses, and thats what i see, cpu starts at 70°C and then goes slowly to 96°C
    meaning the cooler mounted can't take enough heat of my cpu :(

    system setup
    2x 140mm fans on the intake 1000 rpm(front)
    1x 120mm fan on the back 1200 rpm
    2x 120mm fan on CPU block 200-800 rpm(came with cpu block)
    All blow torwards the back of my comp, so i have a good airflow

    Now i watched another air cooling unit 

    be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 cpu-koeler and claimed 250W TDP cooling capacity, i gues i need to buy this one asap as i'm risking my CPU to fry atm

    Any other hints? water cooling seems expensive, and i'm not a fan of this ;) since i need to mount a big cooler for the water

    this site was usefull for the temps :
    https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-10900/22.html


    "" Power consumption and heat output of the Core i9-10900 at stock are laughable. With just 40°C under load, it runs cooler than all the high-end CPUs in our test group, which is not surprising because of the 65 W TDP. When throttled, it chugs along at relatively low clock and voltage, which makes the i9-10900 the most power-efficient Intel processor. With just 10 kilojoules to complete Cinebench, it is more energy efficient than even the majority of Zen 2 Ryzens. Only the Ryzen 9 3900XT is slightly better at 9.6 kJ. Once you unleash the beast, things are different. Power consumption shoots up to 240 W from 140 W, temperatures rise to 75°C, and energy usage is at 14 kJ for a Cinebench run—but it runs 33% faster, making it a very interesting example to illustrate where the 14 nm process runs out of steam. Is that power increase bad? I'm not sure, doesn't everybody want options? Now you have them. You can run super-efficient and wait longer for calculations to complete or speed things up to Core i9-10900K levels at the cost of higher heat and power, which will be a reasonable tradeoff for many of our readers. ""

    greetz 

    Dettie

×
×
  • Create New...